Borough Park, Workington

The fortieth anniversary of the Valley Parade fire is a time for reflection, no less the recognition of how much has changed in English football since 1985. Whilst on a motorcycle trip up the Solway coast I visited Borough Park, home of Workington AFC and it prompted memories of the lower division grounds I visited when I began to follow BCAFC and a reminder of the state of English football stadia of that era.

Historically, finance was always the critical issue dictating spectator safety. However it was not simply a shortage of funds to maintain stands and terracing as distinct from a mindset that afforded ground maintenance a lower priority to actually spend money for that purpose. Prior to the fire disaster in 1985 for example, the ‘modernisation’ of grounds tended to be confined to the erection of segregation fencing.

Whilst you could point a finger at lower division grounds being in the worst condition and in the greatest need of renovation, they were not necessarily the least safe. The restructuring of the lower divisions and replacement of the regionalised third divisions with the national third and fourth divisions in 1958 had failed to stem the collapse in attendances and ironically this latter factor probably explains why disasters were so few. Aside from the general impoverishment of lower division clubs that constrained spending, low crowds made it easier for them to justify economies on maintenance and repair. Visiting larger stadia in the early 1980s I always felt more at risk at First Division grounds than attending bread and butter Fourth Division matches involving Bradford City.

By the late 1970s Valley Parade was already decrepit and crucially, despite Bradford City developing new funding streams from lotteries the money was directed at team strengthening instead of ground redevelopment. Those supporters with concerns about ground facilities tended to stay away with the hardcore more inclined to put up with poor conditions and voicing a preference for resources to be focused on winning games.

Valley Parade was in a category of larger grounds staging lower division football that could boast a pedigree of having been a first division ground at some stage in their history. In this regard it was not alone and in 1980 for example you could point to Bloomfield Road (Blackpool), Leeds Road (Huddersfield), Fratton Park (Portsmouth) or even Boothferry Park (Hull) (NB the latter was of higher division standard although never staged football at first division level) as stadia with their best years long behind them. The difference was that in the case of Valley Parade, its best years were even further back and Bradford City had been forced to cope with lower division finances since 1937.

There was also a category of grounds that had never tasted success other than a handful of cup dramas. These were the grounds of the perennial strugglers who lived hand-to-mouth and in general were represented by a handful of northern clubs who had been admitted to the Football League when it was expanded in 1921 with the new Division Three (North). The likes of Crewe, Darlington, Halifax, Hartlepool and Rochdale had been archetypal survivors and were also known for their basic and outdated ground facilities. (Others such as Accrington, Ashington, Durham or Nelson or Stalybridge and more recently Barrow in 1972 had long since fallen by the wayside and lost their League membership.) At the end of the 1970s you would additionally nominate the grounds of Chester (Sealand Road), Doncaster Rovers (Belle Vue) and Newport County (Somerton Park) for their poor state.

Even the two clubs joining the Football League in the second half of the 1970s – Wimbledon (1977) and Wigan Athletic (1978) – could hardly boast impressive grounds and it is questionable whether Springfield Park (Wigan) was an improvement on Southport’s Haig Avenue (which ironically boasted one of the most modern stands in English football, constructed to replace the original wooden stand that had burned down in 1966). With regards Wimbledon’s original Plough Lane home, from what I recall it was no better than such as Gresty Road (Crewe) or Spotland (Rochdale).

Which then brings us to Workington, the club which lost its Football League membership to Wimbledon in 1977 having originally been elected in 1951 in place of New Brighton. The club now competes in the Northern Premier League Premier Division, the seventh tier of English football. Whilst members of the League, Workington’s Borough Park ground is remembered for its basic amenities although it boasted a good reputation for the standard of its pitch.

In much the same way that Workington’s membership of the Football League was uneventful, the club has enjoyed limited success in non-league football during the last 48 years and has continued to be disadvantaged by its remote geographical location. At least as a League club it could entice new recruits to play for the Reds. Outside of the Football League it has been handicapped by the lack of a major benefactor and my suspicion is that this curtailed the ambitions of the club, forcing an emphasis instead on survival which has at least been achieved without any incidence of formal insolvency.

The club was inevitably impacted by the de-industrialisation of the town and its economic decline in the 1970s and 1980s in particular. Needless to say, whereas each of the other League grounds highlighted above have either been significantly redeveloped or replaced, that has not been the case with Borough Park although plans are afoot for its imminent replacement with a new ‘sports village’ (a similar concept to that at Fylde and Scarborough). A successful football club might have been the antidote that the town needed to cope with economic and social change. Belatedly, the development is intended to make sport central to local community initiatives.

It is pretty difficult not to feel sorry for Workington AFC and I am not ashamed to say that I’ve always had a softspot for the Reds. Borough Park dates from 1937 and retains much the same footprint as when it staged League football. Originally comprising traditional ash / clinker embankments with railway sleeper terraces this had been gradually replaced by concreted surfaces and covered stands were later constructed in the 1950s. The distinctive stand that covered the southwest terrace remains but the headline change to the ground has been the partial demolition of the main stand in 1988 in the wake of the Bradford fire. Although of brick construction with a steel sheet roof and steel frames, the seating and floor of the stand was wooden and considered a fire risk. The directors – cognisant of potential criminal liability from a fire hazard – may have panicked but the decision also removed the cost of future maintenance which the club would likely have struggled to afford.

The club offices and dressing rooms which were in the bottom of the old main stand continue to be used, covered by steel roofing. There is also a modest but homely banqueting suite in honour of the late Bill Shankly who was club manager between January, 1954 and November, 1955. The ‘Popular Side’ on the east side of the ground was covered in 1958 and seating installed after the loss of the main stand but the former covered stand in the northwest corner has been demolished. The current capacity is stated as 3,101 with 500 seats which has been more than sufficient for recent attendances.

With a net loss of facilities, Borough Park remains basic and feels run down. Nevertheless, even in its current state the ground is functional and remains carefully maintained and tidy. Even more remarkable perhaps is the excellent condition of its concrete terraces. Impoverished it may be but the ground has been secured by the effort and commitment of volunteers which is a tribute in itself. On a good day – and you can hardly blame the weather and wind of the Solway Firth on the club – Borough Park is a fine venue to watch football with excellent terrace vantages. It is also like a trip back in time to a classic old fashioned fourth division ground that has not been overwhelmed by progress. Borough Park is literally the last of its kind.

I visited the ground in April, 2025 and was given access by John Blackwell – former chairman, groundsman, volunteer but above all committed supporter – to take these photographs. The last time I had been to Borough Park was to watch Bradford Park Avenue more than twenty years ago and the main change since then had been the lopping of the former floodlight pylons and replacement with the current configuration. (In fact I think the ground looks in a better state now than was the case previously when my overriding impression had been  that of neglect.) Earlier in the winter, roofing panels had been blown off the Popular Side in a gale and pending demolition of the ground, these have not been replaced.

There has been talk of a Cumberland Sports Village for the best part of a decade and there have been ongoing delays caused by local politics and financing arrangements. Until recently, there was the suggestion of the ground being demolished as early as May but it now seems that Workington AFC will remain at Borough Park for at least another season. In anticipation of the development this summer, the club had not invested in fertiliser for the grass during the last close season – the plan being to install a 3G artificial grass pitch – but it still didn’t look too bad as a playing surface.

Under the new scheme, the Reds will groundshare with Workington Town RLFC (who wear blue shirts) and the adjacent Lonsdale Park – a former greyhound stadium and earlier home of Workington AFC – is being developed as a community pitch. The coming together of the Reds and Town revives the ground sharing arrangement at Borough Park immediately after the war following the formation of the rugby club in 1944 and before the opening of nearby Derwent Park in 1956 (which has also staged speedway).

It could be claimed that Borough Park has seen more success as a rugby league ground rather than as a football venue and the early success of Workington Town (ie RL champions in 1951) likely raised the profile of the town which helped secure the election of the Reds to the Football League. Equally, the emergence of Workington Town may have encouraged the Football League leadership to seek geographical representation in the area. After an inauspicious start (ie finishing bottom, second from bottom and then fifth from bottom of Division Three (North) in its first three seasons) the club established itself as a competitive – even if unsuccessful – side in lower division football with promotion to Division Three in 1963/64 (at the expense of promotion rivals, Bradford City). In the FA Cup, a third round tie against Manchester United in January, 1958 (a month before the Munich air disaster) that attracted a record twenty-one thousand crowd to Borough Park has been the highlight in the club’s history.

It was only in its last four seasons that Workington to all intents became anchored to the bottom of the basement division – 91st in 1973/74 and 1974/75 and then 92nd in 1975/76 and 1976/77 – with the same impression of hopelessness that had characterised Bradford Park Avenue in its own last four seasons in the Football League between 1966/67 and 1969/70. By coincidence, around this time Workington Town RLFC also became a much diminished force in the Rugby League. Collectively, it served to erode the sporting self-respect of the town that was already subject to a difficult economic environment.

The general consensus is that in 1977 Workington AFC fell victim to the lobbying of ambitious non-League clubs (ie Wimbledon basking in the prestige of its FA Cup run in 1974/75) and the lack of enthusiasm from others to make the long trek beyond the hills to fulfil fixtures with an unglamorous side. It didn’t help that attendances were amongst the lowest in Division Four albeit not that much lower than Rochdale who would maintain their Football League status until relegation in 2023. Whether Workington AFC could have enjoyed a revival had the club been re-elected in 1977 is questionable and my guess is that it would have continued to struggle, particularly in the absence of financial support. Likewise, during the last fifty years Workington Town RLFC has lost the pedigree it had previously enjoyed and is now a shadow of its former self.

From a Bradford perspective, Workington’s record against City and Avenue as a Football League club was remarkably different. Of 26 seasons in the Football League, Workington played against Bradford City in 17 (seven in Division Three (North) and ten in Division Four) and between 1964-67 it was a division above Bradford City. Of the 34 League games, they won ten (including four away at Valley Parade) and lost twelve and achieved the double against City in both 1956/57 and 1963/64. In the FA Cup the sides met on three occasions with City winning each time.

The two clubs played each other during Workington’s final five seasons in the Football League of which the Reds won only once (at Borough Park in November, 1973) and lost six games. The last competitive fixture between Workington and Bradford City at Borough Park was on 29th October, 1976 which was City’s promotion season when they secured the double over the Reds. Although younger supporters like to think of Bradford City as a ‘big club’, it’s worth remembering that fifty years ago in 1974/75 the average League gates at Borough Park were 1,481 and those at Valley Parade only 3,647.

Workington played Bradford Park Avenue during 14 seasons in the Football League (of which seven in Division Three (North) between 1951/52 and 1957/58 and seven in Division Four between 1958/59 and 1969/70. However in those games Workington defeated Avenue on just five occasions and won only once at Park Avenue (in December, 1956) whilst suffering 17 defeats. In the FA Cup the clubs met on three occasions, all of which resulted in Bradford winning.

Workington AFC currently get average crowds of around 800 which is respectable when compared to the 1,300 or so average in their last five seasons in the Football League. Whether gates will improve with new facilities is anyone’s guess. To a large extent Workington remains a rugby league town and there is probably more enthusiasm for the customary folk football competition in Workington, namely the traditional Easter ‘Uppies vs Downies’ event. (Notable have been objections in the local press about development of the Cumberland Sports Village potentially impacting on the course of the ‘Uppies vs Downies’ game.)

Having just about secured its status in the Northern Premier League Premier Division for another season I genuinely hope that the new Cumberland Sports Village will herald a successful new era for Workington Reds. Pending the beginning of construction work I would definitely encourage a visit Borough Park with the prospect of a final season of football in 2025/26.

John Dewhirst

Thanks for visiting my blog. You will find content about the history of Bradford City from the top down menu. I tweet from @jpdewhirst

** If you are interested in football photography then have a look for issue #2 of BRADFORDIANA which features Valley Parade. BRADFORDIANA is a photozine with 12 issues being published during 2025 in celebration of Bradford.

In praise of the EFL Trophy

Published 19th February, 2025

The EFL Trophy competition (aka Vertu Trophy in its latest manifestation) has its critics and like others I am not comfortable with the inclusion of junior Premier League sides. Nevertheless, the experience of their participation since 2016 has probably been worthwhile if only because their failure to make an impact provides a strong counterweight to any suggestion that the experiment should be extended elsewhere in English football.

As far as Bradford City is concerned, the club has benefited enormously from taking the competition seriously in the last couple of seasons. Admittedly the attendances at games in the group stages have been modest but latterly there has been a much greater enthusiasm, reflected for example by respectable away followings to the likes of Aston Villa and Rotherham. The financial benefits of reaching the semi-finals in 2023/24 and 2024/25 are unlikely to have been massive (albeit better than nothing) but I believe the real gain has come from the opportunity to rekindle some self-belief from cup success. Whilst my preference would be that it was derived from either the FA Cup or the Football League Cup, the EFL Trophy has at least provided another chance for drama and excitement, if not some form of glory and the prospect of playing at Wembley.

Despite the defeat in Birmingham at St Andrews, the performance of the Bantams could not be faulted. It was exactly the sort of gutsy, against-the-odds display that tends to be remembered as well as being consistent with the club’s ‘Bantams’ identity. In fact it was a classic City cup performance and a reminder that Bradford City AFC, like its predecessor Manningham FC (a rugby club that competed in both the Rugby Union and Northern Union) has built a reputation based on performance in cup competitions.

Manningham FC for example came to prominence in the Yorkshire County Cup during the 1880s under the auspices of the Yorkshire Rugby Union. This included memorable ties with Bradford FC at Park Avenue and reaching the final of that competition in 1885 which helped to establish the club as a leading side in Yorkshire. In turn this provided the impetus and confidence to originally develop the Valley Parade site in 1886 when forced to relocate.

So too, Bradford City AFC is best known for having won the FA Cup in 1911 and it has been in cup competition as opposed to the league that Bradford City has continued to have most success, the ‘History Makers’ campaign in 2013 for instance following in the tradition of ‘Glorious 1911’.

There has been the continuity of celebrated giant-killings throughout the club’s history from defeat of first division Wolverhampton Wanderers in 1906 to that of then Premier League champions, Chelsea in 2015. The club’s self-identity as underdogs – plucky bantams – has come into its own in cup competition against ‘bigger’ clubs. Even in the bleakest years, the fact that Bradford City had won the FA Cup could not be taken away and provided the club with respectability.

Whilst we haven’t had any high profile giant-killing this season, and the EFL Trophy remains a lower profile competition than either the FA Cup or the Football League Cup, in no small way it has allowed the club to rediscover its historic mojo. A cold night in Birmingham has strengthened the self-confidence and self-belief among players and supporters alike and will hopefully provide the necessary springboard for the club to finally escape the basement division. Neither is the timing insignificant coming in the 40th anniversary of the Valley Parade disaster as well as the year in which Bradford is the City of Culture. Both are relevant to the identity of the city and there is no reason why BCAFC should not benefit from – and reinforce – the feelgood factor that will hopefully accrue from the City of Culture programme of events in 2025 alongside a successful promotion campaign.

The visit to Birmingham was a reminder not just of heroic cup exploits of old, but of the massive gulf in financial resources. But who knows, maybe the media exposure of cup campaigns including the drama at St Andrews last night will entice a billionaire to discover a love for BCAFC and come forth with funds to bankroll the club. Of course we can but hope but it was precisely the cup headlines in 2013 and 2015 that attracted outside interest in Bradford City to start with and made people consider investment.

For now let’s hope that the performance at Birmingham will generate further momentum for the remaining games of the season to ensure that we win promotion. As unglamorous as may be the case, the Vertu Trophy could well prove to have helped shape the season which is reason enough not to be dismissive about the competition.

Follow the links above for features about the history of Bradford City.

Book Review: Kick Off!

‘Kick Off! The start of spectator sports’ by Dr David Pendleton (Naked Eye Publications, 2018)

I had been looking forward to the publication of this book and set aside an evening to digest. As it turned out my cup of tea was still warm by the time I’d finished reading. This is indeed a short book; it lacks illustrations and I doubt that there could be more than 40,000 words. Any shorter and it would probably be described as a pamphlet. The content of the book broadly mirrors that of the author’s 120,000 word dissertation about the origins of sport in Victorian Bradford minus its academic literature review. However there is the addition of references to womens sport, a number of which are lacking in substance but were presumably sufficient to meet the stipulations of the publisher.

The author examines a selection of the sporting activities undertaken in Victorian Bradford beginning with cricket and the early history of Bradford CC as well as entertainments such as knurr and spell, horse racing and pedestrianism that were common in the early to mid-century. The bulk of the coverage however relates to rugby and association football.

Bradford established for itself a reputation as a hotbed of sporting activity and enthusiasm in the nineteenth century, a pioneer of commercial rugby at Park Avenue and in the first decade of the twentieth century, of soccer at Valley Parade. Bradford witnessed a revolution in the commercialisation of sport and the transformation of sports clubs from recreational bodies to fully-fledged businesses. As in other northern towns, sport became an expression of civic patriotism and pride. Without a doubt Bradford offers a fascinating case study of how sport became commercialised and yet, until recently, what happened in Bradford has been given little attention and the early sporting history of the district had been forgotten.

Surprisingly there is very little coverage in the book to explain how the Bradford experience differed to what happened elsewhere in Great Britain or for that matter, elsewhere in the Anglophone world. Even a fleeting comparison of the experience in Bradford with that in say Newport, a similar industrial frontier town (and one likewise wedded to rugby) or with what happened in other industrial areas at the time would have been relevant. People seeking a broader perspective will be disappointed and the title is misleading by not making clear that it is concerned only with Bradford.

Described as a ‘popular edition’, being a distillation of his dissertation, I struggle to see what audience the author or the publisher is really trying to reach. ‘Kick Off! The start of spectator sports’ does not bring fresh observations or frameworks to the wider academic discussion about nineteenth century sport which may explain why the original dissertation has not been published for an academic readership. It is equally challenging to see what it offers non-academic readers who will find it the equivalent of eating empty calories. On this occasion neither is there any outstanding graphic design to compensate. All told it seems more like a vanity publication for its own sake.

Ultimately my criticism of this book is derived from the omission of a number of key themes from the author’s discussion of spectator sports becoming established in Bradford. Given that they would explain how and why commercialised sport developed as it did in Bradford – with distinct, local characteristics – it is not insignificant that they should have been missed out.

I am credited in the foreword with having provided the author with assistance (although I did notice that my books are not listed at the back of his own for further reading or reference). However the credit should not be interpreted as an implied endorsement of what he has written because quite clearly he has not read what is in my own books or articles published online (VINCIT etc – links below).

I am genuinely surprised that during the course of his doctoral research Pendleton failed to identify the motive of charity fundraising; the role of the Rifle Volunteers (territorial army); the influence of cricket on the commercial development of football; of how Bradford CC had been conceived in 1836 as an electoral vehicle by the Tories; the importance of the railways; the impact of urban geography and the property market; or the pioneering efforts of Jack Nunn – all of which were critical in the origins of sport and the eventual development of professional sport across the town. Mention is also lacking of how Bradford FC became known as a team of celebrities, the club that provided more England internationals before 1895 than any other in the north of England. Each of these is a major omission and collectively it undermines his credibility. For the author to have missed so much raises fundamental doubts about his scholarship.

Incredibly none of these examples afforded a mention in his dissertation – let alone in this book – and hence it is difficult to avoid the charge that Pendleton’s coverage is both superficial and patchy.

There is not even a footnote reference about the Bradford Charity Cup launched in 1884 which had a massive role in the development of a local football culture. Its influence was not just confined to rugby and can be linked to subsequent local rivalries in the Bradford & District Football League (from 1899) and the Bradford Cricket League (after 1903), as well as being a formative influence on Bradford cricket’s Priestley Cup.

Whilst there is considerable discussion of how public houses promoted leisure attractions and sporting entertainments as commercial initiatives in the mid nineteenth century, no mention is given of how the town fathers sanctioned a cultural commitment to recreation in Bradford through the development of civic parks across the district. The town’s first had been Peel Park which opened in 1853, becoming the venue for the popular West Riding galas and military tattoos that were the original mass spectator events in Bradford.

Although a distinct development, Park Avenue (opened in 1880) should be seen in the context of the programme of new public parks that followed in the decade after the opening of Lister Park in 1873 (ie Horton Park (1878), Bowling Park (1880) and Bradford Moor Park (1884)). Those parks were a source of considerable municipal pride and a statement that Bradford, and Bradford people, valued recreation. Park Avenue thus shared the cultural spirit that those parks represented. Crucially Bradford sports clubs saw themselves following in the tradition of respectable recreation as distinct from public house and showground ventures such as those at Quarry Gap, Dick Lane that were considered vulgar and mercenary, a point missed by Pendleton.

Likewise the author fails to explain how ‘football’ (in the case of Bradford, rugby) achieved such a broad take-up during the second half of the 1870s through to the triumph of Bradford FC in the Yorkshire Cup in 1884. A major factor in this was the extent to which social groups in Bradford were networked, linking people as diverse as those associated with half-day closing campaign groups, Volunteers, merchants, warehousemen and Scottish immigrants. No recognition is given to the importance of the Leuchters Restaurant in Kirkgate, Bradford as an important early meeting place for sports enthusiasts. Social networks were a vital mechanism to build popular support for the game in Bradford, another subtlety that has been missed.

One of the biggest influences on the commercial development of rugby in Bradford in the final quarter of the nineteenth century was the railways. The urban geography of the town and its topography created limitations on where the game could be played and the catchment of potential spectators. The railways played a major role in making venues accessible to people living within and without the district. The best illustration of this was the site adjacent the Stansfield Arms at Apperley Bridge and it was no coincidence that each of the major grounds in Bradford were within walking distance of a railway connection: for example not just Valley Parade and Park Avenue but Usher Street (St Dunstans station) and Bowling Old Lane (Bowling). During the 1870s, rugby fixtures at Peel Park and Lister Park similarly benefited from the proximity of Manningham station. Railways also allowed Bradford FC to establish a national reputation through tours to Scotland and the south of England and railways were the means by which teams could visit the town and allow Bradford people to attend games elsewhere in the county.

Equally surprising is that his discussion of gate-taking football clubs is confined to Bradford FC and Manningham FC (not Bradford RFC and Manningham RFC as he refers) which overlooks the significant number of junior clubs in the Bradford district who operated as commercial undertakings – the likes of Shipley FC, Bowling FC, Bowling Old Lane FC and other village sides. The story of how they failed is equally relevant to understand why others were successful.

Nor is there any reference to other participation sports such as athletics, cross country running, swimming, gymnastics, cycling, lacrosse, rowing, skating or even chess. Recognition of the fact that a number of these spawned commercial activity would have been relevant, as would comment about why they failed to become established as spectator sports even though on occasions large crowds assembled in Bradford to watch competitors in some of these activities.

There is also a number of historical inaccuracies in the book, for example the statement that the first attempt to launch an association club in Bradford was in 1895 and the suggestion that former Park Avenue chairman Harry Briggs was known for having been a former player. The first recorded instance of women’s football was not in Inverness in 1888 but Edinburgh in 1881 and in that earlier year there was even a match at Windhill, Shipley. Nor was it the case that Manningham FC was actively involved in raising funds on behalf of strikers during the Manningham Mills dispute in 1891. Amusingly Pendleton refers to the fact that Manningham RFC (sic) have oft been described as ‘a peoples’ team’. Amusing because to my knowledge it is only he who has ever done so, a description that is of dubious validity as I have said before.

With regards female participation in football, the author overlooks the practice of games being staged for the amusement and titillation of spectators, principally as shows of farce and mockery. For example, newspaper accounts of games at Windhill in 1881, Valley Parade in 1895 and Park Avenue in 1917 are consistent in highlighting that those attending had not done so for the purpose of watching football. Neither is there mention of the practice of mixed pantomime matches which were staged at Valley Parade and Park Avenue after 1891 involving entertainers from the Bradford theatres. These were initially rugby games but later, soccer and despite being staged for charity, the FA adopted a rather highbrow attitude in 1907 declaring that they did not want the game to become pure burlesque. (Quite likely the same attitude was one of the factors in the FA ban on female football introduced in 1921.)

‘Kick Off!’ provides a broad outline of what happened in Bradford in the nineteenth century but singularly fails to provide explanation of the how and why. It’s not simply that the author has overlooked a number of key points which is a major failing in itself. It is the lack of a bigger picture perspective that has denied him the means to identify the same underlying themes impacting on successive decades – the themes which shaped the development of sport in the city with distinctly local characteristics. In so doing, Pendleton has not grasped his opportunity to be original which should have been possible even within the word limit.

Submission of a doctoral dissertation requires a review of what others have already written on the candidate’s chosen subject. Having read his original dissertation I can see that Pendleton fulfilled this in great detail but I can’t help feeling that he spent more time thinking about what other people had written about other places than developing his own thoughts about somewhere (ie Bradford) that had previously been overlooked by academics. Hence he has missed many of the themes that were prominent locally quite simply because they may have been less relevant elsewhere and had not been flagged in the literature. Therefore, whilst his final dissertation was perfectly adequate to secure an academic qualification it’s not necessarily the basis for narrating a convincing account of what happened locally.

A further observation is that Pendleton’s reliance for the bulk of his research on the Bradford press denied him the more detached and candid observations provided by newspapers published in Leeds. Their reports would have afforded him an alternative and bigger picture perspective of events in Bradford and this shortcoming in his research is apparent in a number of the conclusions he reaches. Each of the Leeds papers, and the Yorkshire Evening Post in particular, had considerable coverage of Bradford sport. The celebrated YEP journalist, Alfred Pullin – known as ‘Old Ebor‘ (1860-1934) – was intimate with happenings in Bradford cricket and rugby, writing in detail about the town’s clubs and sportsmen yet he is not cited at all in Pendleton’s dissertation. Pullin it should be noted is recognised as having been a pioneer of sports journalism and an authority on late Victorian sport. He had himself played rugby in Bradford in his younger days.

Pendleton likes to presents himself as an authority yet is prone to leaps of imagination and narrating an imagined, wishful history. He can tell a good story but beware his casual sound bites that lack substance and defy critical examination. His claim for example that German money won the FA Cup for Bradford City AFC in 1911. There’s certainly no evidence for it in the club accounts of that era and no documented reference to such largesse in newspaper reports but heavens, don’t let it get in the way of him spinning a yarn. The same individual who claimed that Manningham FC was a bastion of ‘progressive politics’, ignorant of the inconvenient reality that the club leadership was dominated by Liberal Unionists and Tories.

The rear cover describes David Pendleton as ‘one of the north’s leading historians of sport and leisure‘. Seriously? If indeed that is the case – as opposed to being a casual statement of vanity – then the reader could reasonably expect more than sloppy research and assessment of findings that is neither thorough nor original. Either way it sets a standard by which this book can be judged. This book is certainly not a good advert for his supposed skills of scholarship.

‘Kick Off!’ reads better as individual chapters or essays in isolation rather than as a complete publication and it is a bit like the curate’s egg with some parts better than others. The book lacks a thread providing linkage between the constituent parts and reads like a compilation of disparate stories about a limited selection of Bradford sport that the author has struggled to meld into a whole. The reader is left with more questions than answers and without satisfactory explanations for how – and why – the development of sport in Bradford came to be shaped as it did. Even at £8.99 (*) I am not convinced that it is worth the money and besides, it makes a mockery of Dr Pendleton’s supposed stature in the academic world. The publisher boasts that this is a readable and accessible book which is indeed the case. It’s just a shame about the content and the empty calories.

(*) As at September, 2021 reduced in price to £2.15 on Amazon but still not worth the price or indeed the postage.

John Dewhirst

I have written widely about the history of sport in Bradford and you will find various features on this blog.

My two most recent books, ROOM AT THE TOP and LIFE AT THE TOP narrate the origins of sport in Bradford and its subsequent development. Further details can be found at: BANTAMSPAST HISTORY REVISITED BOOKS

The following is a summary link of online Articles by John Dewhirst on the history of Bradford sport